Comments on: Please comment on this abstract http://ptsefton.com/2008/05/20/please-comment-on-this-abstract.htm "As noble thoughts the inward being grace, So noble whiskers dignify the face." Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:10:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: ptsefton http://ptsefton.com/2008/05/20/please-comment-on-this-abstract.htm#comment-1875 ptsefton Thu, 22 May 2008 04:15:32 +0000 http://ptsefton.com/2008/05/20/please-comment-on-this-abstract.htm#comment-1875 @lucychili - good points there re authoring dynamics that I won't have time to address in the paper it's much more about getting access to the technology, without looking at what you can actually do with it @lucychili - good points there re authoring dynamics that I won’t have time to address in the paper it’s much more about getting access to the technology, without looking at what you can actually do with it

]]> By: lucychili http://ptsefton.com/2008/05/20/please-comment-on-this-abstract.htm#comment-1872 lucychili Tue, 20 May 2008 14:30:52 +0000 http://ptsefton.com/2008/05/20/please-comment-on-this-abstract.htm#comment-1872 for me there is a fair bit of stuff to take on board when deciding to write a paper in a web2 context. if the web2 tool just means its blue with bits which are movable all good. if it means youre co-athoring with the world then the forma dn ownership and dialogue and authoritative voice is different. imagine if the raw data is single source v if it is crowd sourced via a bloom clock http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Bloom_Clock you can see me flailing between the two modes when i was writing this in the wikiversity http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:FLOSS_and_education buried a long way back in this rambly conversation there are some of my thoughts on what i was doing wrong http://alexanderhayes.com/Media/2008/podcasts/24042008_Janet_Hawtin_Alex_Hayes.mp3 largely not being confident and explicit up fron about what people could contribute and thinking through how to make collaboration work. likely to be some interesting room for thought around sourcing data from different places and ensuring they are all apples and not some pears. and also clearing copyright in collaborative contexts. sound slike an interesting paper j for me there is a fair bit of stuff to take on board when deciding to write a paper in a web2 context.

if the web2 tool just means its blue with bits which are movable all good.

if it means youre co-athoring with the world then the forma dn ownership and dialogue and authoritative voice is different.
imagine if the raw data is single source v if it is crowd sourced via a bloom clock http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Bloom_Clock
you can see me flailing between the two modes when i was writing this in the wikiversity http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:FLOSS_and_education

buried a long way back in this rambly conversation there are some of my thoughts on what i was doing wrong
http://alexanderhayes.com/Media/2008/podcasts/24042008_Janet_Hawtin_Alex_Hayes.mp3
largely not being confident and explicit up fron about what people could contribute and thinking through how to make collaboration work.

likely to be some interesting room for thought around sourcing data from different places and ensuring they are all apples and not some pears.
and also clearing copyright in collaborative contexts.

sound slike an interesting paper

j

]]>