<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM Lotus Symphony word processor does not have broken HTML export like all the others!</title>
	<link>http://ptsefton.com/2008/01/25/ibm-lotus-symphony-word-processor-does-not-have-broken-html-export-like-all-the-others.htm</link>
	<description>"As noble thoughts the inward being grace, So noble whiskers dignify the face."</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PT&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenDocument Format support not as great as the cheer squad keep saying</title>
		<link>http://ptsefton.com/2008/01/25/ibm-lotus-symphony-word-processor-does-not-have-broken-html-export-like-all-the-others.htm#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>PT&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenDocument Format support not as great as the cheer squad keep saying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ptsefton.com/2008/01/25/ibm-lotus-symphony-word-processor-does-not-have-broken-html-export-like-all-the-others.htm#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] on the same application, while IBM Lotus Symphony also uses a lot of the same code, with the menus scrambled and no HTML export. At least they&#8217;re likely to interoperate.Google Docs still has pretty useless ODT support. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on the same application, while IBM Lotus Symphony also uses a lot of the same code, with the menus scrambled and no HTML export. At least they&#8217;re likely to interoperate.Google Docs still has pretty useless ODT support. I [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
