<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM Lotus Symphony word processor does not have broken HTML export like all the others!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ptsefton.com/2008/01/25/ibm-lotus-symphony-word-processor-does-not-have-broken-html-export-like-all-the-others.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ptsefton.com/2008/01/25/ibm-lotus-symphony-word-processor-does-not-have-broken-html-export-like-all-the-others.htm</link>
	<description>This seems to be a workblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:41:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PT&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenDocument Format support not as great as the cheer squad keep saying</title>
		<link>http://ptsefton.com/2008/01/25/ibm-lotus-symphony-word-processor-does-not-have-broken-html-export-like-all-the-others.htm/comment-page-1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>PT&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenDocument Format support not as great as the cheer squad keep saying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptsefton.com/2008/01/25/ibm-lotus-symphony-word-processor-does-not-have-broken-html-export-like-all-the-others.htm#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] on the same application, while IBM Lotus Symphony also uses a lot of the same code, with the menus scrambled and no HTML export. At least they&#8217;re likely to interoperate.Google Docs still has pretty useless ODT support. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the same application, while IBM Lotus Symphony also uses a lot of the same code, with the menus scrambled and no HTML export. At least they&#8217;re likely to interoperate.Google Docs still has pretty useless ODT support. I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
